-120x80.png)
Reviews
Product
Author: Jeff M.
It's like alien tech
- Review Add on: 28/01/2023
- Average Rating:
II was skeptical: t's a lot of money in a small package, so I had high expectations. Ultra compact, and a serious game changer. The 640 is years ahead of the 384 in terms of resolution. Very happy with purchase and AGM.
Product
Author: Max Minkovetsky
Overall extremely happy with the unit
- Review Add on: 28/07/2022
- Average Rating:
I have both iRay MH25 and the new StingIR 640, and between the 2 the StingIR (In my opinion) is the better unit. The image quality seems roughly the same but a bit better on the StingIR. Looking through both units simultaneously I noticed that the StingIR have what seems like a bit of smaller picture then the MH25, but realized that's due to the fact that the MH25 is not a true 1x but slightly enlarged picture due to the front optic ocular lens zoom, while the StingIR maintains a true 1x picture. Another advantage is the ability to use 18650 in the StingIR compared to the MH25 that takes 16650 battery with extension. The StingIR has a better controls, it's lighter and the built quality is very good. note : If you planning to use 18650 "Protected" type battery be aware that the extension provided with the kit might be a bit short and tight fit. I wish AGM would included an extension cap that supports these kind of common batteries.
